Disney has filed a lawsuit against Sling TV, claiming the streaming service’s new short-term subscription model violates its carriage agreement. The complaint was lodged in the Southern District of New York and centers on Sling’s recently introduced $4.99 “Pass”, which allows customers to stream ESPN and other Disney-owned channels for a 24-hour period.
Disney’s Position
Traditionally, Sling TV—owned by Dish Network—charges $49.99 per month for its full service. But with the introduction of the lower-cost daily pass, customers can access high-demand events such as live sports, award shows, or premieres without committing to a monthly subscription.
Disney argues this undermines its own streaming strategy, particularly the newly launched $29.99 per month ESPN service, by giving viewers a cheaper alternative. The company insists Sling is violating its licensing deal, which specifies distribution through monthly subscriptions, not day passes.
A Disney spokesperson told Deadline:
“Sling TV’s new offerings, which they made available without our knowledge or consent, violate the terms of our existing license agreement. We have asked the court to require Dish to comply with our deal when it distributes our programming.”
Sling TV’s Response
Sling has defended the program, saying it is focused on customer choice and affordability. A representative told Variety:
“We are aware of what has been filed and believe Disney’s lawsuit is meritless. We will vigorously defend our right to bring customers a viewing experience that fits their lives, on their schedule and on their terms. We are excited about our new pass subscriptions and the overwhelmingly positive response we’ve received from fans looking for simple, affordable ways to enjoy the content they love.”
What’s at Stake
At the heart of the dispute is whether Sling can offer flexible short-term streaming options without violating contracts built around monthly agreements. Disney maintains that allowing “day pass” access erodes the value of its premium ESPN+ and other streaming products, while Sling argues that consumers deserve more flexible, budget-friendly ways to access live television.
The outcome of this case could set an important precedent for how streaming providers structure subscription models in an increasingly competitive market.
Pirates & Princesses (TM) (Stylized as PNP) is an independent, opinionated News and Information site focused on Travel, Entertainment, Fashion, the “Geek Girl” Lifestyle, and more. We focus heavily on Walt Disney World, Disneyland, Universal Orlando Resort, and other themed entertainment and travel destinations. Our news staff includes former theme park and entertainment industry employees, journalists and dedicated pop culture and theme park enthusiasts. Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of this site, our affiliates or our sponsors.